Volume 5, Issue 3 (9-2023)
sjamao 2023, 5(3): 1-11 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dolat A, Saeidi H, Heshmati J. Application of activity-based costing method (ABC) in determining the cost of agricultural services in North Khorasan. sjamao 2023; 5 (3) :1-11
URL: http://sjamao.srpub.org/article-7-102-en.html
URL: http://sjamao.srpub.org/article-7-102-en.html
Department of Accounting, Shirvan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shirvan, Iran
Abstract: (435 Views)
The general public policies of the administrative system are a set of macro-administrative policies that are obligated by the Iran leadership as a model, guide the actions of the country. One of the most important policies is the issue of logistic villageschr('39') agility. The reason for this importance is the scientific propositions of researchers that interlace the agility of administrative systems to their survival. Achieving agility requires the enablers that helped that system to achieve this important goal. The conclusion is that every administrative system must have the enablers to achieve agility they directly affect the ability of the organization to respond quickly and effectively to unpredictable changes in the organizational environment. The aim of this paper is to propose and implement an approach to evaluate the enablers for effective implementation of agility policy in logistics villages of Tehran province. After determining the factors of enablers agility by content analysis method and explaining their importance and causal relationships with fuzzy DEMATEL technique, CFA and EFA analysis was performed on the obtained model and the goodness of the model was considered and finally, evaluation was done by questionnaires with fuzzy linguistic words.
Keywords: General Public Policies of the Administrative System, Enablers of Policy Implementation, Logistic Village, Fuzzy Logic
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Business, Management and Accounting (General)
Received: 2023/06/5 | Revised: 2023/07/25 | Accepted: 2023/08/20 | Published: 2023/09/1
Received: 2023/06/5 | Revised: 2023/07/25 | Accepted: 2023/08/20 | Published: 2023/09/1
References
1. Goldman S, Nagel R, Preiss K. Agile competitors and virtual organizations: Strategies for enriching the customer. London: Kenneth: Van No Strand Reinhold, International Thomas Publishing. 1995.
2. Uyanik C, Tuzkaya G, Oğuztimur S. A literature survey on logistics centers' location selection problem. Sigma: Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences/Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018; 36(1).
3. Abdul Malek A Tambi, Mohamed Noor Mohid, Idrus Abd Shukor, Mohd Sabri Mohd. World Appl Sci J. 2013; 25(3): 421-427.
4. Dubey R, Altay N, Gunasekaran A, Blome C, Papadopoulos T, Childe SJ. Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment. Int J Operat Prod Manag. 2018. [DOI:10.1108/IJOPM-04-2016-0173]
5. Lin CT, Chiu H, Chu PY. Agility index in the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ. 2006; 100(2): 285-299. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.013]
6. Howlett M, Ramesh M. Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press Canada. 2003.
7. Wlodarkiewicz-Klimek H. Agility of knowledge-based organizations. In Advances in Ergonomics of Manufacturing: Managing the Enterprise of the Future. Springer, Cham. 2016; 375-384.
8. Žitkienė R, Deksnys M. Organizational Agility Conceptual Model. 2018. [DOI:10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.7]
9. Ulrich D, Yeung A. Agility: the new response to dynamic change. Strat HR Rev. 2019. [DOI:10.1108/SHR-04-2019-0032]
10. Koçyiğit Y, Akkaya B. The role of organizational flexibility in organizational agility: A research on SMEs. Bus Manag Strat. 2020; 11(1): 110-123. [DOI:10.5296/bms.v11i1.16867]
11. Zhang Z, Sharifi H. Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategy: A taxonomical approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2007; 54(2): 351-370. [DOI:10.1109/TEM.2007.893989]
12. Yusuf YY, Al-Dabass D, Gunasekaran A, Ren J. A mathematical modelling framework for agile manufacturing systems. In Conference Proceedings of the UK Simulation Society, marzo, Cambridge. 2001; 216-222.
13. Holbeche LS. Organisational effectiveness and agility. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. 2018.
14. Ahammad MF, Glaister KW, Gomes E. Strategic agility and human resource management. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2020; 30(1): 100700. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100700]
15. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry. 1985;289(331):289-327.
16. Mayer C. The assessment: Recent developments in industrial economics and their implications for policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1985 Oct 1:1-24. [DOI:10.1093/oxrep/1.3.1]
17. Kuznets K. Simon Kuznets. Economic Growth and Income Inequality .American Economic Review. 1955:45-1.
18. Hood MR. Muriel Driver Memorial Lecture. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1976 Sep;43(3):105-11.
19. Elmore RF. Complexity and Control: What Legislators and Administrators Can Do About Implementating Public Policy.1980.
20. Lang A. Collaborative governance in health and technology policy: The use and effects of procedural policy instruments. Administration & Society. 2019 Feb;51(2):272-98. [DOI:10.1177/0095399716664163]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |