Volume 5, Issue 2 (4-2023)
sjamao 2023, 5(2): 1-10 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Olyayi N, Etemad S M K. Project performance evaluation with earned value management approach using the integrated method of data envelopment analysis and Malmquist productivity index (Case study: bridge construction projects of Shiraz Municipality). sjamao 2023; 5 (2) :1-10
URL: http://sjamao.srpub.org/article-7-179-en.html
URL: http://sjamao.srpub.org/article-7-179-en.html
Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zand Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract: (550 Views)
Given the importance of performance evaluation in Iran’s economic growth and development, project performance measurement is of great importance for developing countries such as Iran, which is on the way of the initial stages of its industrialization process. The present study is aimed to evaluate the project performance with earned value management approach using the integrated method of data envelopment analysis and Malmquist's productivity index. The research method is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in nature. The statistical population of the current study includes 4 bridge construction projects of Shiraz municipality in 2022 and sampling method was not used in this research. The present study calculates efficiency with data envelopment analysis and Malmquist's productivity index. For this purpose, the concepts of efficiency and the introduction of data envelopment analysis technique is presented as one of the methods of efficiency measurement and also the concepts of Malmquist's productivity index are also discussed. By computing efficiency using Deap software, it was found that three projects are efficient and one project tis inefficient. By calculating Malmquist's productivity index, it was indicated that project D has the highest productivity and project B has the lowest productivity.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Quantitative Methoods in Project Management
Received: 2023/03/22 | Revised: 2023/05/25 | Accepted: 2023/06/5 | Published: 2023/06/25
Received: 2023/03/22 | Revised: 2023/05/25 | Accepted: 2023/06/5 | Published: 2023/06/25
References
1. Fatahi Nafchi, Marzieh; Shiroviazad, Hadi (2020). Evaluate the performance of construction projects based on identified and clustered implementation barriers using data envelopment analysis of the case study: Executive Affairs of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province Housing Foundation. Innovation Management and Operational Strategies, Volume 1, Number 1, PP:73-81.
2. Toor, S.R. ; Ogunlana, S.O.;(2010).Beyond the Iron triangle: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects", International Journal of Project Management,28(3), pp. 228-236 (2010) [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.005]
3. Ngacho, C. and Das, D.; (2014).A performance evaluation framework of development projects: An empirical study of constituency development fund (CDF) construction projects in Kenya", International Journal of Project Management, 32(3), pp. 492-507 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.005]
4. Ibn al-Rasul, Seyyd Asghar; Tarhani, Farzad; (2007). The method of implementing and developing the balanced scorecard model in industrial organizations (conference). National Performance Management Conference (3).
5. Stoner , james A.F; Freeman, Edward.R;(1982).Management book.
6. Neely, A. R ;(2000). "Performance Measurement system Design: Developing and Testing a process based Approach." International Journal of Operations & Production Managet,(45),1119-20 [DOI:10.1108/01443570010343708]
7. Amado, Carla A.F; Santos, Sergio.P.;Marques, Pedro. M. ;(2012). integrating the Data Envelopment Analysis and the Balanced Scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment. Omega, (40), 390-403 [DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2011.06.006]
8. Villalba-Romero,Felix; Liyanage,Champika;(2016).Evaluating success in PPP road projects in Europe: a comparison of performance measurement approaches,6th Transport Research Arena April 18-21 [DOI:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.089]
9. Bryde, D.J ; Brown, D.; (2004). The influence of project performance measurement system on the success of a contract for maintaining motorways and trunk roads. Project Management Journal, 35(4), 57-65 [DOI:10.1177/875697280403500407]
10. Pinto, J. K. ;Slevin, D. P.; (1988). Critical success factors across the project life cycle: definitions and measurement techniques. Project Management Journal, 19(3), 67-75
11. Vanhoucke, M. ;(2009), Measuring Time - Improving Project Performance Using Earned Value Management, Springer, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-1014-1]
12. Ballesteros-Pérez.P; Cerezo-Narváez. A; Otero-Mateo. M.; Pastor-Fernández. A; Vanhoucke.M ;(2019). Performance comparison of activity sensitivity metrics in schedule risk analysis. Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 106 No. February, p. 102906 [DOI:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102906]
13. Upadhaya, B; Munir, R ; Blount, Y; (2014). Association between performance measurement systems and organisational effectiveness. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(7), 853- 875. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-02-2013-0091 [DOI:10.1108/IJOPM-02-2013-0091]
14. Ferguson, A.; Myers, C. ; Bartlett, R.; (1932). Quantitative estimates of sensory events (pp. 331-349) [DOI:10.1038/130810a0]
15. West Churchman, C;(1959). Measurement: Definitions and theories book (pp. 83-94). New York: Wiley.
16. Srinivasan. V;(2013). Analysis of static and dynamic load on hydrostatic bearing with variable viscosity and pressure. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Volume 6(s6), pp. 4777-4782. [DOI:10.17485/ijst/2013/v6isp6.11]
17. Hronec, S. M.;( 1993). Vital Signs: Using Quality, Time and Cost Performance Measurements to Chart Your Company's Future book. New York NY: Amacom.
18. Dalrymple,John.F; Bryar,Peter.;(2006). SME Construction Industry Subcontractors Performance Measurement and Improvement. Australia.: Central Queensland University,Doi: https://hdl.handle.net/10018/8744
19. Kueng, Peter;(2000). Process Performance Measurement System: A Tool To Support Process-Based Organizations. Total Quality Management, Volume 11 (1), pp. 67-85 [DOI:10.1080/0954412007035]
20. Cocca. Paola;Alberti, Marco;( 2010). A Framework To Assess Performance Measurement Systems in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management., Volume 59(2), pp. 186-200 [DOI:10.1108/17410401011014258]
21. Lipke. W;( 2003). Schedule is different. Measurable News 31, 31-34.
22. Gholamian, A. (2017). Evaluate the operational performance of the project by integrating the earned value management approach. Learning curve theory. Industrial Engineering Journal, Volume 52, Number 2, Summer 2018, Pp: 233 - 247
23. Mehrgan, M. Dehghan Nayyer, M. (2009). TOPSIS-BSC coherent approach to evaluate top management faculties of universities in Tehran province. Industrial Management Journal, Volume 1, No.2, Spring and Summer 2019, Pp: 153 to 168.
24. Jahan Tighi, M. (2018). A model to select project with limited resources using data envelopment analysis, Journal of Modern Research in Mathematics, 4th year, 15th issue.
25. Nasrallahi, M. (2015). The use of F-PROMETHEE to evaluate and rank contractors of construction projects with a case study of mass housing builders in Meh Shahr Jadid, Hashtgerd, Industrial Management Journal, Volume 7, No. 1, Pp: 175-188.
26. Vafadar Asghari, M. Kurd, b. Salarzehi, H. (2013). Evaluation of the relative efficiency of Mehr housing projects using the data envelopment analysis technique with a case study of cities with more than 25 thousand people in Sistan and Baluchistan Province, Economics and Urban Management Quarterly, No. 5, Winter 2013.
27. Ming-Lang Tseng;(2010).Implementation and performance evaluation using the fuzzy network balanced scorecard,Computers & Education 55 (2010) page:188-201 [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.004]
28. Hui-hui Liu; Yao-yao,Song ;Guo-liang,Yanga;(2010).Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory,European Journal of Operational Research 273 (2019) 364-375 [DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.046]
29. Holod, Dmytro; Lewis,Herbert. F;(2011).Resolving the deposit dilemma: A new DEA bank efficiency model,Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 2801-2810, [DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.03.007]
30. Maritza,TorresSamuela;Carmen,LuisaVásquezb;Marisabel,Lunab;Nunziatina,Buccib;Amelec,Viloriac;Tito,Crissiec Jessica,Manosalvac;(2020).Performance of Education and Research in Latin American Countries through Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), The 10th International Symposium on Frontiers in Ambient and Mobile Systems (FAMS),April 6-9,2020,warsaw, Poland. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.079]
31. Nguyen, Phong Hoang;Thi Bich Pham,Duyen;(2020).The cost efficiency of Vietnamese banks - the difference between DEA and SFA.Journal of Economics and Development Vol. 22 No. 2, 2020 pp. 209-227 [DOI:10.1108/JED-12-2019-0075]
32. Balf, F.R.; Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.; Alizadeh Afrouzi, M.; (2010). The interval malmquist productivity index in DEA. Iranian Journal of Optimization, 2, 311-322
33. Mari, L ;(1997). The role of determination and assignment in measurement. Measurement, 21(3), 79-90 [DOI:10.1016/S0263-2241(97)00050-X]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |